What Does Professionalism Mean in Ambulance Service? A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Paramedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25974/gjops.v3i1.68Keywords:
Ambulance Service, Paramedics, Professionalism, Qualitative Research, Focus Group DiscussionAbstract
Background: With the establishment of the profession of German paramedics (Notfallsanitäter:innen), the question of “professionalism” in the ambulance service has gained importance. However, the concept remains inconsistently defined and has rarely been explored empirically from the profession’s own perspective.
Objective: This exploratory qualitative study investigated how paramedics understand professionalism in everyday practice and which factors influence the development and expression of professional practice.
Methods: Three group discussions were conducted with seven paramedics (n=6 male, n=1 female; mean age ~28 years; mean professional experience just under 3 years). Discussions (mean duration ~48 minutes) were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis following Mayring (combining deductive and inductive category development). Ethical standards (voluntary participation, anonymization, informed consent) were adhered to; a clearance statement from the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rettungswissenschaften was available.
Results: Participants described professionalism as a multidimensional “overall package” that goes beyond technical knowledge. Core dimensions included (1) professional/clinical competence (safe practice aligned with guidelines and standards; orientation towards continuing education), (2) social competence (empathy, communication, respectful demeanor, teamwork), (3) methodological competence (structured approaches, situational flexibility, autonomous decision-making), and (4) personal competence (resilience, self-reflection, continuous self-development). Influencing factors comprised team culture and feedback, role models, continuing education (especially simulation and debriefing), working conditions (workload, breaks, staffing shortages), and regional differences in regulations and training structures.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that professionalism is a lifelong developmental process requiring both individual motivation and supportive organizational conditions. Potential levers include comprehensive continuing education (technical and non-technical skills), structured mentoring and role modelling, simulation-based training with reflection, and strengthening an open feedback and learning culture; harmonization of training standards may be relevant in the longer term.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarah Schürmann, Andrea Gergen, Thomas Hofmann

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
We publish open access under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/?ref=chooser-v1).
Content may be redistributed and reprocessed (including for commercial purposes), provided that the original source is cited and the same licence conditions apply.
